How to Compete Against Nefarious Companies and Make Search Better
Sunday, May 22nd, 2011How to Compete Against Nefarious Companies and Make Search Better
PT Barnum once said, “There’s no such thing as bad publicity.” This goes for online marketing as well these days. When companies engage in questionable business tactics they seem to be rewarded. So much for the warm fuzzy tones sounded by the folks looking to provide a “better search experience.” I’m not talking about content farms, link salespeople that flood the net and our emails with links for sale, purple bingo slippers link folks, or the rogue SEO with a link funnel that could stretch to the moon and back. I’m talking real life goods and service industries.
Let me state for the record that I am a Pittsburgh Online Marketing Technologist for a small company. I have a client who shall remain nameless. (You’ll see why in a minute) His business competes in a fairly rough market segment. Folks without a clue; but with deep pockets to throw at shady “get me to the top, I don’t care how” practices. It seems they have come upon a great PT Barnum scheme. Just rob people, cybersquat competitors domains (lawsuit settled and sealed), overcharge customers (reviews manipulated to shield the SE’s), acquire 300,000 links (none of which were bought I’m sure) sweep it all under the rug of relentless TV and YouTube campaigns and Walla; a formula for success?
Then after the dust settles… the dust is still settling in fact. They get caught. So the newspapers promote them with digital and print mentions. They get links from major news and publication channels and their rankings skyrocket with the kind of promotion that NY biz got and that they couldn’t buy for a million bucks like this . So they use their increased sales to buy more ad space to promote their business on local TV and the net. Soon it’s a barrage that my client, remember my client?... can’t compete against with tactics like good customer service and solid professionalism.
The best analogy I can give you is a movie from the 70’s called “Used Cars”. If you’ve seen it, you have got the picture. If you haven’t, check it out. It’s funny as the day is long. I did some link analysis to find the most frustrating stats. As I suspected, links and mentions from top news services with anchor text like ***** Lawsuit and ****** scam that they put up to bury the truth from the consumer. Links my client can’t get and wouldn’t want. So what’s my point?
The SE’s reward bad press and publicity. Barnum was right.
The online customer doesn’t see the companies’ link profile. Most hardly research a business. They just call the first one on the list to fill a need. Because of the fuzzy search experience mentioned previously, there is a level of trust. By the way, I really do have to thank this competitor for waking me up and angering me all the same. I seem to perform better under duress. The short answer then becomes work harder, more efficiently and find new creative ways to leverage my clients’ strengths.
I am looking at something that needs fixed with the algorithm to evolve Search and bring it to the credibility that will assure it’s survival as a viable option for consumers. TRUST.
An ancillary benefit is that we will hopefully all still have jobs. So what needs fixed?
LINKS:
Obviously the rankings need some help determining which links should pass juice and how much juice they should pass. Any recent link buying News ring a bell? Should lawsuits and bad press pass juice? Should they pass the same juice a piece of good content does? How do the search engines determine sentiment? Are they trying?
REVIEWS:
In my opinion, this is totally broken. Our experience is that a consumer must be polarized to leave a review i.e. the review is either awesome or horrible. If the service provided is professional and the customer got just what they ordered, they don’t take the time to leave a review. Padded review statistics push the nefarious to the top. I hear rumors in the wind that Google is addressing this but we’ll all have to wait and see after the Décor deal. This article mentions Google’s review solution in the works. We’ll see.
COMMENTS:
Comments have been manipulated for years to get links. What determines a quality comment? Are Nofollows enough? Bot registration and “Nice Post” comments for a link get old. If Akismet says it’s spam it’s spam, we don’t have the time to track down every comment. So it’s broken.
PRESS and NEWS:
Can we educate the news community as to the detriment of giving mentions and links to derogatory stories? I saw a story on the local news about the company in question immediately followed by their ad. Maybe the News should do an exposé about how they perpetuate and support companies like this?
If you’re reading this you’re probably involved in the search field in some way or trying to be a more informed consumer. SEO and Online Marketing have had a black eye for some time in the eyes of the public. I read a lot of posts about our community being slick and hucksterish, well let’s start from the ground up and prove the naysayers wrong. I’ll do my part in Making Search Better one link, review, or comment at a time.




